# Deep-Dive Analysis: vaultfire-avalanche

**Repo path:** `/home/user/workspace/vaultfire-avalanche/`
**Chain:** Avalanche C-Chain (Chain ID: 43114)
**Status badge:** Alpha
**License:** MIT (Copyright 2026 Ghostkey316)

---

## 1. Repository File Inventory (All Non-Git Files)

```
vaultfire-avalanche/
├── .gitignore
├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── scripts/
│   ├── verify_contracts.py          ← Only substantive source file
│   └── __pycache__/
│       └── verify_contracts.cpython-312.pyc
└── tests/
    ├── __init__.py
    ├── test_verify_contracts.py     ← Unit tests for the script
    └── __pycache__/                 ← Compiled test cache
        ├── __init__.cpython-312.pyc
        ├── test_verify_contracts.cpython-312-pytest-8.3.5.pyc
        └── test_verify_contracts.cpython-312.pyc
```

**Total substantive source files: 3** (README.md, scripts/verify_contracts.py, tests/test_verify_contracts.py)

There are NO Solidity contracts, no ABIs, no deployment artifacts, no Hardhat/Foundry configs, and no frontend code in this repo. This is purely a reference/verification repo.

---

## 2. All 15 Contract Addresses (Avalanche C-Chain, ID: 43114)

| # | Contract Name | Address | Snowtrace |
|---|---------------|---------|-----------|
| 1 | ERC8004IdentityRegistry | `0x57741F4116925341d8f7Eb3F381d98e07C73B4a3` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x57741F4116925341d8f7Eb3F381d98e07C73B4a3 |
| 2 | AIPartnershipBondsV2 | `0xea6B504827a746d781f867441364C7A732AA4b07` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0xea6B504827a746d781f867441364C7A732AA4b07 |
| 3 | AIAccountabilityBondsV2 | `0xaeFEa985E0C52f92F73606657B9dA60db2798af3` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0xaeFEa985E0C52f92F73606657B9dA60db2798af3 |
| 4 | ERC8004ReputationRegistry | `0x11C267C8A75B13A4D95357CEF6027c42F8e7bA24` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x11C267C8A75B13A4D95357CEF6027c42F8e7bA24 |
| 5 | ERC8004ValidationRegistry | `0x0d41Eb399f52BD03fef7eCd5b165d51AA1fAd87b` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x0d41Eb399f52BD03fef7eCd5b165d51AA1fAd87b |
| 6 | VaultfireERC8004Adapter | `0x6B7dC022edC41EBE41400319C6fDcCeab05Ea053` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x6B7dC022edC41EBE41400319C6fDcCeab05Ea053 |
| 7 | FlourishingMetricsOracle | `0x490c51c2fAd743C288D65A6006f6B0ae9e6a8695` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x490c51c2fAd743C288D65A6006f6B0ae9e6a8695 |
| 8 | MultisigGovernance | `0xCc7300F39aF4cc2A924f82a5Facd7049436157Ee` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0xCc7300F39aF4cc2A924f82a5Facd7049436157Ee |
| 9 | VaultfireTeleporterBridge | `0x0dF0523aF5aF2Aef180dB052b669Bea97fee3d31` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x0dF0523aF5aF2Aef180dB052b669Bea97fee3d31 |
| 10 | DilithiumAttestor | `0x211554bd46e3D4e064b51a31F61927ae9c7bCF1f` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x211554bd46e3D4e064b51a31F61927ae9c7bCF1f |
| 11 | ProductionBeliefAttestationVerifier | `0xb3d8063e67bdA1a869721D0F6c346f1Af0469D2F` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0xb3d8063e67bdA1a869721D0F6c346f1Af0469D2F |
| 12 | BeliefAttestationVerifier | `0x227e27e7776d3ee14128BC66216354495E113B19` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x227e27e7776d3ee14128BC66216354495E113B19 |
| 13 | MissionEnforcement | `0xcf64D815F5424B7937aB226bC733Ed35ab6CaDcB` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0xcf64D815F5424B7937aB226bC733Ed35ab6CaDcB |
| 14 | AntiSurveillance | `0x281814eF92062DA8049Fe5c4743c4Aef19a17380` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0x281814eF92062DA8049Fe5c4743c4Aef19a17380 |
| 15 | PrivacyGuarantees | `0xc09F0e06690332eD9b490E1040BdE642f11F3937` | https://snowtrace.io/address/0xc09F0e06690332eD9b490E1040BdE642f11F3937 |

**Additional (non-Vaultfire, referenced):**
- USDC (Native Circle): `0xB97EF9Ef8734C71904D8002F8b6Bc66Dd9c48a6E`

All 15 addresses are duplicated consistently between README.md and verify_contracts.py. The test suite (`test_addresses_match_main_repo`) spot-checks 6 of the 15 addresses against the main repo README values. No address mismatches were identified between the two files.

---

## 3. Feature Inventory

### 3.1 ERC-8004 Identity Suite (4 contracts)
- **ERC8004IdentityRegistry** — Core agent identity registry implementing ERC-8004. Agents register with name, agentType, and description. Provides verifiable on-chain identity distinct from a simple username.
- **ERC8004ReputationRegistry** — On-chain peer feedback and rating system, scores 0–10,000.
- **ERC8004ValidationRegistry** — ERC-8004 identity validation layer.
- **VaultfireERC8004Adapter** — Protocol adapter connecting the ERC-8004 suite to broader Vaultfire functionality.

### 3.2 Bond Contracts (2 contracts)
- **AIPartnershipBondsV2** — Mutual economic stake contracts between agents or human-agent pairs. Both parties stake AVAX. Five partnership types: Collaboration, Delegation, Service Provider, Data Sharing, Oracle Consumer. Bond tiers: Bronze (0.01 AVAX), Silver (0.05 AVAX), Gold (0.1 AVAX), Platinum (0.5 AVAX).
- **AIAccountabilityBondsV2** — Agents stake AVAX as a behavioral commitment. Bonds can be slashed for protocol violations. Record is permanent on-chain.

### 3.3 Reputation and Scoring (Street Cred Engine)
Composite on-chain score (0–95 max):

| Component | Max Points |
|-----------|-----------|
| ERC-8004 Identity Registered | 30 pts |
| Partnership Bond Exists | 25 pts |
| Partnership Bond Active | 15 pts |
| Bond Tier Bonus (Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum) | 5/10/15/20 pts |
| Multiple Active Bonds | 5 pts |

Score tiers: Bronze (20+), Silver (40+), Gold (60+), Platinum (80+). The Street Cred Engine is described conceptually but is NOT a separate deployed contract — it appears to be computed from the Identity and Bond registries, likely off-chain or via the Adapter.

### 3.4 Attestation Layer (3 contracts)
- **DilithiumAttestor** — Post-quantum digital signature attestations using CRYSTALS-Dilithium (ML-DSA). The README explicitly notes that bond contracts and identity registry remain on standard ECDSA; full protocol quantum hardening is roadmap only.
- **ProductionBeliefAttestationVerifier** — Production-grade belief attestation verification; uses Dilithium per README.
- **BeliefAttestationVerifier** — Belief attestation verifier (appears to be a non-production variant or earlier version deployed alongside the production one — having both deployed is notable).

### 3.5 Bridge (1 contract)
- **VaultfireTeleporterBridge** — Cross-chain trust portability. Deployed on Avalanche at `0x0dF0523aF5aF2Aef180dB052b669Bea97fee3d31`. The Base counterpart is at `0x94F5...6Fb2`. README describes the bridge as "coming in v1.0" for actual cross-chain reputation sync — i.e., it is deployed but not yet functionally active for production sync.

### 3.6 Oracle (1 contract)
- **FlourishingMetricsOracle** — On-chain flourishing measurement oracle. No further behavioral detail provided in this repo.

### 3.7 Governance (1 contract)
- **MultisigGovernance** — Multi-signature governance module. No threshold/signer details provided.

### 3.8 Protocol Enforcement (3 contracts)
- **MissionEnforcement** — On-chain mission enforcement constraints.
- **AntiSurveillance** — Protocol-level anti-surveillance commitment.
- **PrivacyGuarantees** — Cryptographic privacy guarantees.

### 3.9 Payments (no deployed contract — referenced)
- **x402 Trust-Gated Payments** — Described as "Ready": EIP-712 signature → signer recovery → USDC allowance check → on-chain settlement. Uses the native Circle USDC at `0xB97EF9Ef8734C71904D8002F8b6Bc66Dd9c48a6E`. No dedicated contract in the 15; appears to be an integration pattern rather than a new contract.

### 3.10 Messaging (no deployed contract — referenced)
- **XMTP Agent-to-Agent Messaging** — XMTP integration for encrypted cross-agent and human-agent messaging. Described as working across chains. No on-chain contract in this repo; purely an off-chain/protocol integration.

---

## 4. Documentation Quality

**Overall: Good for a reference/partner-facing repo, but thin on technical depth.**

### Strengths
- README is well-structured with clear sections: overview, feature table, contract addresses, quick-start code examples, protocol descriptions, architecture diagram, cross-chain comparison table, and links.
- ASCII architecture diagram showing contract layers and data flows.
- Quick-start JavaScript examples using `viem` are functional and directly usable.
- Explicit, honest disclosures: "Full quantum resistance is a roadmap milestone" and "Cross-chain reputation sync is v1.0."
- Every contract has a description in both README and the verify script's DESCRIPTIONS dict.
- The verification script is well-documented (docstrings on every function, clear CLI help).
- Test file has clear class/method docstrings.
- Bond tier pricing and Street Cred scoring rubrics are fully specified with numeric detail.

### Weaknesses
- No ABIs, source Solidity, or interface definitions in this repo. A developer cannot interact with contracts beyond the one ABI fragment shown in the README (registerAgent, createBond).
- No deployment script — contracts are already deployed, and there's no record of how they were deployed (constructor arguments, deployer address, block number, tx hash).
- No changelog or deployment date.
- The relationship between `BeliefAttestationVerifier` and `ProductionBeliefAttestationVerifier` is unexplained — two contracts with near-identical names exist with no distinction documented.
- FlourishingMetricsOracle, MultisigGovernance, AntiSurveillance, PrivacyGuarantees, MissionEnforcement — each gets a one-line description, no ABI or behavioral spec.
- No gas cost estimates or AVAX denomination guidance beyond the bond tier values.
- x402 payment flow is described conceptually but no code example or contract address given.
- XMTP messaging integration is mentioned but zero implementation detail provided.

---

## 5. Cross-Reference: Base Contracts

**Yes — explicit cross-referencing is present.**

The README contains a dedicated "Cross-Chain — Base and Avalanche" table with truncated addresses for both chains:

| Contract | Base Address | Avalanche Address |
|----------|-------------|-------------------|
| ERC8004IdentityRegistry | `0x3597...58bC` | `0x5774...B4a3` |
| AIPartnershipBondsV2 | `0xC574...4b4` | `0xea6B...4b07` |
| AIAccountabilityBondsV2 | `0xf92b...6Da8` | `0xaeFE...8af3` |
| ERC8004ReputationRegistry | `0xdB54...a55F` | `0x11C2...bA24` |
| VaultfireTeleporterBridge | `0x94F5...6Fb2` | `0x0dF0...3d31` |
| DilithiumAttestor | `0xBBC0...0A4` | `0x2115...cF1f` |

Note: Only 6 of the 15 contracts are shown in the cross-chain comparison — the table does not cover contracts that may not be deployed on Base (e.g., no Base address shown for MultisigGovernance, FlourishingMetricsOracle, AntiSurveillance, PrivacyGuarantees, MissionEnforcement, ValidationRegistry, Adapter). Full Base addresses are truncated (4 chars shown), making programmatic verification from this README alone impossible.

The repo links directly to [vaultfire-base](https://github.com/Ghostkey316/vaultfire-base) for full Base deployment details.

---

## 6. Bridge Implementation Details (VaultfireTeleporterBridge)

### What the repo says
- Contract is deployed on Avalanche C-Chain: `0x0dF0523aF5aF2Aef180dB052b669Bea97fee3d31`
- Counterpart on Base: `0x94F5...6Fb2` (truncated)
- Intended to enable Base ↔ Avalanche ↔ Ethereum trust portability
- Full cross-chain sync is a **v1.0 milestone** — not yet live
- The feature table marks it as "Deployed" (implying the contract bytecode exists on-chain)

### What is NOT in this repo
- No bridge source code (Solidity)
- No ABI or interface for the bridge
- No explanation of the bridging mechanism (whether it uses Avalanche's native Teleporter protocol, a custom message-passing layer, or a third-party bridge)
- No events, function signatures, or message format documented
- No Ethereum bridge counterpart address provided (only Base and Avalanche addresses referenced)
- The name "Teleporter" aligns with Avalanche's native cross-subnet Teleporter (AWM), but there is no explicit confirmation or citation of this

### Assessment
The bridge is deployed but documented only at a marketing/vision level. The mechanism, security model, and operational status are unknown from this repo alone.

---

## 7. Deployment Scripts

**There are NO deployment scripts in this repo.**

The only script (`scripts/verify_contracts.py`) is a read-only verification tool — it queries `eth_getCode` and `eth_chainId` via JSON-RPC but performs no writes, deployments, or transactions.

The script:
- Uses Python standard library only (no web3.py, no ethers.js)
- Supports 4 Avalanche RPC fallback endpoints
- Supports `--json` and `--verbose` CLI flags
- Checks bytecode presence at each of the 15 addresses
- Also checks the native Circle USDC address
- Returns exit code 0 if all 15 deployed, 1 if any missing

There is no: Hardhat config, Foundry config, deployment scripts, constructor argument records, or transaction hashes for initial deployment.

---

## 8. Gaps, TODOs, and Incomplete Features

### Explicitly Deferred to v1.0
1. **Cross-chain trust sync** — VaultfireTeleporterBridge is deployed but inactive for actual reputation portability
2. **VaultfireNameService (VNS)** — "Currently deployed on Base only — Avalanche VNS deployment is planned for v1.0"
3. **Full quantum resistance** — DilithiumAttestor covers attestations; bond and identity contracts remain ECDSA
4. **Ethereum deployment** — Referenced in the bridge scope (Base ↔ Avalanche ↔ Ethereum) but no Ethereum addresses provided anywhere

### Structural Gaps in This Repo
5. **No contract source code** — Zero Solidity files. This repo cannot be used to verify, audit, or reproduce deployments.
6. **No ABIs** — Only two ABI fragments (registerAgent, createBond) embedded in the README's JavaScript examples.
7. **No deployment records** — No tx hashes, block numbers, constructor args, or deployer addresses.
8. **Truncated cross-chain addresses** — Base addresses shown in short form only; cannot verify without going to the Base repo.
9. **Two BeliefAttestationVerifier contracts** — `BeliefAttestationVerifier` and `ProductionBeliefAttestationVerifier` both deployed with no explanation of the distinction or whether the former is deprecated.
10. **Street Cred Engine location** — Described as a scoring system but no corresponding deployed contract. It is either computed off-chain, embedded in the Adapter, or inside one of the registries — not clarified.
11. **FlourishingMetricsOracle** — Described only as "on-chain flourishing measurement oracle" with zero detail on data sources, update mechanism, or who can write to it.
12. **MultisigGovernance** — No signer list, threshold, or governance scope described.
13. **x402 payments** — Described as "Ready" but no contract address and no code example beyond a conceptual flow description.
14. **XMTP integration** — Referenced but entirely off-chain; zero implementation detail.
15. **The hub (theloopbreaker.com)** — Described as operating on Base mainnet; Avalanche deployment context for end-users is unstated.

---

## 9. SDK References

**Yes — the SDK is referenced.**

The README's "Explore" section links to:
- **[vaultfire-sdk](https://github.com/Ghostkey316/vaultfire-sdk)** — Listed as a related repository

However:
- The SDK is not integrated into this repo in any way (no package.json, no import, no usage example)
- The quick-start code examples use `viem` directly (low-level contract interaction), not the SDK
- There is no SDK documentation, version number, or installation instructions in this repo

The SDK reference is purely a pointer to an external repository.

---

## 10. Summary Assessment

### What This Repo Is
A **partner-facing reference repo** for the Avalanche C-Chain deployment of Vaultfire Protocol. It serves as:
- A canonical list of 15 deployed contract addresses with Snowtrace links
- A human-readable feature overview
- A runnable on-chain verification tool (verify_contracts.py)
- A bridge to the main protocol repo and other Vaultfire repos

### What This Repo Is Not
- A complete implementation: no Solidity source, no ABIs, no deployment scripts
- A developer SDK or integration library
- A standalone codebase: it is entirely dependent on the main repo and Base repo for actual contract source

### Code Quality
- **verify_contracts.py**: High quality for its scope. Clean Python, good error handling, RPC fallback chain, proper argparse, comprehensive docstrings. Test coverage is thorough for the static configuration (address validity, count, descriptions, config constants, CLI flags). No live RPC calls in tests (appropriate for CI).
- **README.md**: Well-structured and readable. Honest about alpha status and deferred features. Weak on technical depth.

### Key Risks and Open Questions
1. No source code available for audit in this repo — security posture of deployed contracts cannot be assessed here
2. Bridge functionality is deployed but non-operational — the v1.0 timeline is unstated
3. Two BeliefAttestationVerifier variants deployed — potential confusion or dead code on-chain
4. VNS missing on Avalanche — name-based agent discovery not available on this chain yet
5. Ethereum deployment referenced in the bridge scope but no addresses exist anywhere in this repo
6. The Street Cred Engine has no corresponding contract — its on-chain/off-chain boundary is unclear
