<!--
NON-NORMATIVE DOCUMENT

This file is historical/legacy/audit material and may contain aspirational language.
The canonical, current claims & limits are in: docs/CLAIMS_AND_LIMITS.md
-->

# 🚨 CRITICAL MATH AUDIT REPORT - Vaultfire Protocol

**Status:** BLOCKING DEPLOYMENT
**Severity:** CRITICAL - Prevents protocol from going to production
**Date:** 2026-01-07
**Auditor:** Claude (Autonomous Agent)

---

## Executive Summary

**CRITICAL FINDING:** 5 out of 9 V2 Bond contracts have fundamental math errors in their `calculateBondValue()` functions that would cause massive over-valuation (50x-600x) or severe under-valuation (0.5x).

**Impact:** These errors would:
- Allow bonds to appreciate 50x-600x beyond their true value
- Enable unfair profit extraction by early participants
- Destroy protocol economics and trust
- Make the protocol unusable in production

**Status:**
- ❌ **5 V2 Bonds with CRITICAL ERRORS** (must fix before deployment)
- ✅ **4 V2 Bonds CORRECT** (no changes needed)

---

## Detailed Findings

### ❌ CRITICAL ERROR #1: BuilderBeliefBondsV2.sol

**Location:** Line 415
```solidity
return (bond.stakeAmount * building * vesting * time) / 1000000;
```

**Multiplier Ranges:**
- `building`: 0-10,000 (buildingVsTransacting score)
- `vesting`: 50-150 (anti-flipping multiplier)
- `time`: 100-250 (time multiplier)

**Math Analysis:**
- **Baseline (50% build, 0 vest, 1 year):** (1 ETH × 5,000 × 100 × 100) / 1,000,000 = **50 ETH** (50x over-valuation) 🔥
- **Good (100% build, 1x vest, 2 years):** (1 ETH × 10,000 × 100 × 150) / 1,000,000 = **150 ETH** (150x over-valuation) 🔥
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 10,000 × 150 × 250) / 1,000,000 = **375 ETH** (375x over-valuation) 🔥

**Correct Divisor:** Should be `10,000,000` or `100,000,000` depending on target appreciation range.

---

### ❌ CRITICAL ERROR #2: LaborDignityBondsV2.sol

**Location:** Line 648
```solidity
uint256 value = (bond.stakeAmount * flourishing * verification * time) / 1000000;
```

**Multiplier Ranges:**
- `flourishing`: 0-10,000 (laborFlourishingScore)
- `verification`: 50-150 (workerVerificationMultiplier)
- `time`: 100-300 (timeMultiplier)

**Math Analysis:**
- **Baseline:** (1 ETH × 5,000 × 100 × 100) / 1,000,000 = **50 ETH** (50x over-valuation) 🔥
- **Good case:** (1 ETH × 7,500 × 125 × 200) / 1,000,000 = **187.5 ETH** (187.5x over-valuation) 🔥
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 10,000 × 150 × 300) / 1,000,000 = **450 ETH** (450x over-valuation) 🔥

**Correct Divisor:** Should be `10,000,000` or `100,000,000`.

---

### ❌ CRITICAL ERROR #3: PurchasingPowerBondsV2.sol

**Location:** Line 619
```solidity
return (bond.stakeAmount * purchasingPower * workerVerification * time) / 1000000;
```

**Multiplier Ranges:**
- `purchasingPower`: 50-200 (overallPurchasingPowerScore)
- `workerVerification`: 50-150 (workerVerificationMultiplier)
- `time`: 100-300 (timeMultiplier)

**Math Analysis:**
- **Baseline (poor metrics):** (1 ETH × 50 × 50 × 100) / 1,000,000 = **0.25 ETH** (0.25x under-valuation) ⚠️
- **Neutral:** (1 ETH × 100 × 100 × 100) / 1,000,000 = **1 ETH** (1.0x) ✓
- **Good case:** (1 ETH × 150 × 150 × 150) / 1,000,000 = **3.375 ETH** (3.375x appreciation) ⚠️
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 200 × 150 × 300) / 1,000,000 = **9 ETH** (9x over-valuation) 🔥

**Issue:** While neutral case is correct (1.0x), the range is too wide. Maximum 9x appreciation is excessive.

**Correct Divisor:** Should be `2,000,000` to `3,000,000` to reduce max appreciation to 3-4.5x.

---

### ❌ CRITICAL ERROR #4: AIAccountabilityBondsV2.sol

**Location:** Line 487
```solidity
return (bond.stakeAmount * flourishing * inclusion * time) / 1000000;
```

**Multiplier Ranges:**
- `flourishing`: 0-10,000 (globalFlourishingScore)
- `inclusion`: 50-200 (inclusionMultiplier)
- `time`: 100-300 (timeMultiplier)

**Math Analysis:**
- **Baseline:** (1 ETH × 5,000 × 100 × 100) / 1,000,000 = **50 ETH** (50x over-valuation) 🔥
- **Good case:** (1 ETH × 7,500 × 150 × 200) / 1,000,000 = **225 ETH** (225x over-valuation) 🔥
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 10,000 × 200 × 300) / 1,000,000 = **600 ETH** (600x over-valuation) 🔥

**Correct Divisor:** Should be `100,000,000` or `200,000,000`.

---

### ❌ CRITICAL ERROR #5: HealthCommonsBondsV2.sol

**Location:** Line 400
```solidity
return (bond.stakeAmount * pollution * health * community * time) / 100000000;
```

**Multiplier Ranges:**
- `pollution`: 0-200+ (pollutionReductionScore)
- `health`: 0-200+ (healthImprovementScore)
- `community`: 50-150 (communityVerificationMultiplier)
- `time`: 100-250 (timeMultiplier)

**Math Analysis:**
- **Baseline (neutral):** (1 ETH × 100 × 100 × 50 × 100) / 100,000,000 = **0.5 ETH** (0.5x under-valuation) ⚠️
- **Good case:** (1 ETH × 150 × 150 × 150 × 150) / 100,000,000 = **5.0625 ETH** (5x appreciation) 🔥
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 200 × 200 × 150 × 250) / 100,000,000 = **15 ETH** (15x over-valuation) 🔥

**Issue:** Baseline is only 0.5x (should be ~1.0x), and maximum 15x is too high.

**Correct Divisor:** Should be `150,000,000` to `200,000,000`.

---

## ✅ CORRECT Implementations (No Changes Needed)

### ✅ VerdantAnchorBondsV2.sol
**Location:** Line 327
```solidity
return (bonds[bondId].stakeAmount * score) / 5000;
```
- **Baseline:** (1 ETH × 5000) / 5000 = 1 ETH (1.0x) ✓
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 10000) / 5000 = 2 ETH (2.0x) ✓
- **Status:** CORRECT - Simple and clean implementation

---

### ✅ EscapeVelocityBondsV2.sol
**Location:** Line 239
```solidity
return bonds[bondId].stakeAmount + (bonds[bondId].stakeAmount * incomeGain) / 10000;
```
- **No gain:** 1 ETH + 0 = 1 ETH (1.0x) ✓
- **50% income gain:** 1 ETH + (1 ETH × 5000) / 10000 = 1.5 ETH (1.5x) ✓
- **150% income gain:** 1 ETH + (1 ETH × 15000) / 10000 = 2.5 ETH (2.5x) ✓
- **Status:** CORRECT - Linear scaling based on income gain

---

### ✅ AIPartnershipBondsV2.sol
**Location:** Line 243
```solidity
return (bonds[bondId].stakeAmount * quality) / 5000;
```
- **Baseline:** (1 ETH × 5000) / 5000 = 1 ETH (1.0x) ✓
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 10000) / 5000 = 2 ETH (2.0x) ✓
- **Status:** CORRECT - Same clean pattern as VerdantAnchor

---

### ✅ CommonGroundBondsV2.sol
**Location:** Line 262
```solidity
return (bonds[bondId].stakeAmount * quality) / 5000;
```
- **Baseline:** (1 ETH × 5000) / 5000 = 1 ETH (1.0x) ✓
- **Maximum:** (1 ETH × 10000) / 5000 = 2 ETH (2.0x) ✓
- **Status:** CORRECT - Same clean pattern as VerdantAnchor

---

## Distribution Math Verification (All Correct ✅)

Verified all distribution splits sum to 100%:
- ✅ BuilderBeliefBondsV2: 60/30/10 = 100%
- ✅ LaborDignityBondsV2: 70/30 = 100%
- ✅ PurchasingPowerBondsV2: 70/30 = 100%
- ✅ AIAccountabilityBondsV2: 50/50 = 100%
- ✅ HealthCommonsBondsV2: 70/30 = 100%
- ✅ VerdantAnchorBondsV2: 50/40/10 = 100%
- ✅ EscapeVelocityBondsV2: 80/20 = 100%
- ✅ AIPartnershipBondsV2: 60/30/10 = 100%
- ✅ CommonGroundBondsV2: 80/20 = 100%

---

## Recommended Fixes

### Fix Pattern A: High Score Range (0-10000) Contracts
**Applies to:** BuilderBeliefBondsV2, LaborDignityBondsV2, AIAccountabilityBondsV2

**Current:** `/ 1000000`
**Recommended:** `/ 10000000` (10 million) or `/ 100000000` (100 million)

**Target Appreciation Range:**
- Baseline (5000 score): ~1.0x (no change)
- Good (7500 score): ~1.5-2.0x
- Excellent (10000 score): ~2.0-2.5x

### Fix Pattern B: Mid Score Range (50-200) Contracts
**Applies to:** PurchasingPowerBondsV2

**Current:** `/ 1000000`
**Recommended:** `/ 2000000` to `/ 3000000`

**Target Appreciation Range:**
- Baseline (100 score): ~1.0x
- Good (150 score): ~1.5-2.0x
- Excellent (200 score): ~2.5-3.0x (capped)

### Fix Pattern C: Mixed Range (4 multipliers) Contracts
**Applies to:** HealthCommonsBondsV2

**Current:** `/ 100000000`
**Recommended:** `/ 150000000` to `/ 200000000`

**Target Appreciation Range:**
- Baseline (100×100×50×100): ~1.0x
- Good (150×150×150×150): ~2.0-2.5x
- Excellent (200×200×150×200): ~3.0-4.0x (capped)

---

## Impact Assessment

### If Deployed As-Is:
1. **Economic Collapse:** Early bonds would appreciate 50x-600x, draining all protocol funds
2. **Loss of Trust:** Users would realize bonds are wildly mis-priced
3. **Exploitation:** Malicious actors could extract massive value from broken math
4. **Protocol Failure:** Would need to redeploy all contracts, losing all history

### After Fixes:
1. **Fair Economics:** Bonds appreciate 1.5x-3.0x based on actual performance
2. **Sustainable Growth:** Protocol can operate for years without economic collapse
3. **Trust Maintained:** Math is correct and transparent
4. **Production Ready:** Can safely deploy to mainnet

---

## Next Steps

1. ✅ **Complete Math Audit** (DONE)
2. ⏭️ **Fix all 5 broken contracts** (NEXT)
3. ⏭️ **Re-run all tests** to verify fixes don't break functionality
4. ⏭️ **Update tests** to include bond value calculation assertions
5. ⏭️ **Final review** before deployment
6. ⏭️ **Create PR** with all fixes

---

## Conclusion

This audit discovered CRITICAL math errors that would have made the protocol completely unusable in production. These errors affect **5 out of 9 V2 bonds** and would have caused 50x-600x over-valuation.

**Protocol cannot be deployed until all 5 contracts are fixed.**

The good news: 4 bonds have correct math, distribution splits are all correct, and the fixes are straightforward. Once fixed, protocol will be truly production-ready.

---

**Audit completed by:** Claude (Autonomous Agent)
**User requested:** "please go in and make sure the math is perfect in the whole protocol that is very important"
**Response:** Found 5 critical math errors. Fixing now.
