<!--
NON-NORMATIVE DOCUMENT

This file is historical/legacy/audit material and may contain aspirational language.
The canonical, current claims & limits are in: docs/CLAIMS_AND_LIMITS.md
-->

# Vaultfire ROI Calculator for Partners

**Show partners the money they're losing without you**

---

## Calculator 1: DeFi Protocol / Airdrop ROI

### Current State (Without Vaultfire)

**Assumptions:**
- Total airdrop budget: $1,000,000
- Token price: $1.00
- Total claimers: 100,000 wallets
- Bot farm percentage: 90%
- Real users: 10,000 (10%)

**Current Results:**
```
Real users receive: $1,000,000 ÷ 100,000 = $10 each
Bots receive: $900,000 (90% of budget)
WASTED: $900,000
Real user dilution: 90%
```

**Pain Points:**
- 😡 Real users get only $10 instead of $100
- 💸 $900k spent on bot farms that dump immediately
- 📉 Token price crashes from bot selling
- 🤬 Community backlash ("unfair distribution")

---

### With Vaultfire Integration

**Assumptions:**
- Same airdrop budget: $1,000,000
- Vaultfire verification cost: $0.10 per user
- Verified users: 10,000 (real humans)
- Bot farms filtered: 90,000 (rejected)

**Results:**
```
Verification cost: 10,000 × $0.10 = $1,000
Net airdrop budget: $999,000
Real users receive: $999,000 ÷ 10,000 = $99.90 each

SAVED: $900,000 (not wasted on bots)
Real user value: 999% increase ($10 → $99.90)
```

**ROI Calculation:**
```
Investment: $1,000 (verification)
Savings: $900,000 (bot prevention)
ROI: 90,000% (900x return)
```

**Additional Benefits:**
- ✅ Real users get 10x more tokens
- ✅ No bot dump pressure on price
- ✅ Community loves fair distribution
- ✅ Marketing narrative: "First Sybil-resistant airdrop"

**Payback Period:** Instant (saves 900x the cost)

---

## Calculator 2: DAO Governance ROI

### Current State (Without Vaultfire)

**Assumptions:**
- DAO treasury size: $50,000,000
- Governance proposals per year: 12
- Average Sybil attack attempts: 3 per year
- Cost per governance attack: $10,000,000 (20% of treasury)

**Current Risks:**
```
Annual governance attack risk: 3 × $10M = $30M
Probability of successful attack: 30%
Expected annual loss: $30M × 0.30 = $9,000,000
```

**Pain Points:**
- 🚨 Constant Sybil attack attempts
- 💰 Treasury at risk ($9M expected loss)
- ⚖️ Voter apathy (why vote if whales control everything?)
- 🏴‍☠️ Governance reputation damage

---

### With Vaultfire Integration

**Assumptions:**
- Cost per voter verification: $0.10
- Active voters per proposal: 5,000
- Annual proposals: 12
- Sybil attack prevention: 95%

**Results:**
```
Annual verification cost: 5,000 voters × 12 proposals × $0.10 = $6,000
Prevented governance attacks: 3 × 0.95 = 2.85 per year
Expected savings: $9,000,000 × 0.95 = $8,550,000
```

**ROI Calculation:**
```
Investment: $6,000/year
Savings: $8,550,000/year
ROI: 142,400% (1,425x return)
```

**Additional Benefits:**
- ✅ Reputation-weighted voting (not plutocracy)
- ✅ Privacy-preserved governance
- ✅ Increased voter participation
- ✅ "Most secure DAO governance" narrative

**Payback Period:** First proposal (prevented one $10M attack)

---

## Calculator 3: AI Agent Platform ROI

### Current State (Without Vaultfire)

**Assumptions:**
- AI agent platform (like GPT Store)
- Total agents: 10,000
- User concerns about trust: 80% hesitant to grant financial permissions
- Lost revenue from distrust: $50M annually

**Current Problems:**
```
Revenue loss from trust issues: $50,000,000/year
- Users won't let agents manage DeFi
- Enterprises won't adopt for sensitive tasks
- Regulatory concerns about authorization

Addressable market missed: $100B agent economy
Market capture: 0.1% (trust issues)
```

---

### With Vaultfire Integration

**Assumptions:**
- Constitutional AI verification cost: $0.20 per agent authorization
- Agents using Vaultfire: 10,000
- Average authorizations per agent: 100/year
- Trust issue resolution: 70%
- Revenue increase: $35M

**Results:**
```
Annual verification cost: 10,000 × 100 × $0.20 = $200,000
Revenue increase: $50M × 0.70 = $35,000,000
New market access: Agent economy ($100B TAM)
```

**ROI Calculation:**
```
Investment: $200,000/year
Revenue increase: $35,000,000/year
ROI: 17,400% (175x return)
```

**Additional Benefits:**
- ✅ "First trusted AI agent platform" narrative
- ✅ Regulatory compliance (cryptographic authorization)
- ✅ Enterprise adoption (provable safety)
- ✅ Agent economy market leadership

**Payback Period:** ~2 days

---

## Calculator 4: Base Ecosystem ROI

### Current Ecosystem State (Without Native Identity)

**Assumptions:**
- Base ecosystem TVL: $2B
- Annual Sybil fraud: 5% of ecosystem value
- Lost user trust from scams: $50M
- Competitor advantage (other L2s building identity): High risk

**Current Costs:**
```
Annual Sybil fraud: $2B × 0.05 = $100,000,000
Lost users to competitors: $50,000,000
Ecosystem reputation damage: Priceless

Total ecosystem cost: $150M+/year
```

---

### With Vaultfire as Native Identity Layer

**Assumptions:**
- Vaultfire integration across top 100 Base apps
- Cost: $500k ecosystem grant + infrastructure
- Sybil reduction: 95%
- User retention increase: 20%

**Results:**
```
Ecosystem grant: $500,000 (one-time)
Annual infrastructure: $100,000

Prevented Sybil fraud: $100M × 0.95 = $95,000,000
Retained user value: $50M × 0.20 = $10,000,000
Total annual benefit: $105,000,000
```

**ROI Calculation:**
```
Investment: $600,000 (first year)
Savings: $105,000,000/year
ROI: 17,400% (175x return)
```

**Strategic Benefits:**
- ✅ "Base: The privacy-preserving L2" narrative
- ✅ Differentiation from Optimism, Arbitrum, zkSync
- ✅ Coinbase Wallet integration (ecosystem lock-in)
- ✅ First-mover advantage on privacy identity

**Payback Period:** ~2 days

**5-Year Value:**
```
Year 1: $105M savings - $600k cost = $104.4M
Year 2: $105M - $100k = $104.9M
Year 3-5: ~$105M/year each

5-Year Total: ~$524M value from $1M investment
ROI: 52,300%
```

---

## Calculator 5: General Protocol Integration

### Input Your Numbers:

**Your Protocol Metrics:**
- Monthly active users: ________
- % estimated bots/Sybils: _______ (default: 50%)
- Annual user acquisition cost: $________
- Average revenue per real user: $________

**Calculation:**
```
Real users = MAU × (1 - Sybil%)
Wasted spend = MAU × Sybil% × acquisition_cost
Lost revenue = Real users × ARPU × Sybil_dilution_factor

Example (10k MAU, 50% Sybils, $10 CAC, $100 ARPU):
Real users: 10,000 × 0.50 = 5,000
Wasted CAC: 10,000 × 0.50 × $10 = $50,000/year
Lost revenue: 5,000 × $100 × 0.30 = $150,000/year (30% dilution from Sybils)

Total cost of Sybils: $200,000/year

Vaultfire cost: 10,000 × $0.10 × 12 = $12,000/year
Savings: $200,000 - $12,000 = $188,000
ROI: 1,567% (16x return)
```

---

## Quick ROI Summary Table

| Partner Type | Annual Investment | Annual Savings | ROI | Payback |
|--------------|------------------|----------------|-----|---------|
| **Airdrop (small)** | $1,000 | $900,000 | 90,000% | Instant |
| **DAO Governance** | $6,000 | $8,550,000 | 142,400% | 1 proposal |
| **DeFi Protocol** | $50,000 | $2,000,000 | 3,900% | 1 week |
| **AI Agent Platform** | $200,000 | $35,000,000 | 17,400% | 2 days |
| **Base Ecosystem** | $600,000 | $105,000,000 | 17,400% | 2 days |

**Average ROI: 50,140% (501x return)**

---

## Hidden Costs You're Not Counting

### 1. **Reputation Damage**
- One major Sybil attack = Months of bad PR
- User trust lost = Years to rebuild
- **Cost:** Immeasurable, but easily $10M+ in enterprise value

### 2. **Opportunity Cost**
- Time spent fighting Sybils = Time NOT spent building
- Engineering hours on anti-bot measures = 20% of team
- **Cost:** $500k - $2M annually (engineering time)

### 3. **Regulatory Risk**
- No KYC but need to prevent fraud? Risky position.
- Vaultfire provides Sybil resistance WITHOUT KYC
- **Cost avoidance:** $100k - $1M (legal + compliance)

### 4. **Competitive Disadvantage**
- Competitors with better Sybil resistance win users
- "Most secure" narrative = marketing gold
- **Cost:** Market share loss (5-10%)

**Total hidden costs: $10M - $20M annually**

---

## The Real Question

**It's not "Can we afford Vaultfire?"**

**It's "Can we afford NOT to have Sybil resistance?"**

---

## How to Present This to Your CFO

**Email template:**
```
Subject: ROI analysis: Sybil prevention ($X saved annually)

[CFO Name],

Quick ROI analysis for Vaultfire integration:

CURRENT SYBIL COSTS:
- Bot farms in our airdrop: $900k wasted
- Governance attack risk: $9M expected loss
- User trust damage: $5M+ reputation cost
Total: ~$15M/year in Sybil-related costs

VAULTFIRE SOLUTION:
- Integration cost: $1k - $6k/year
- 95% Sybil reduction
- Privacy-preserved (no KYC liability)

ROI: 25,000% (250x return)
Payback: Instant (first airdrop saves 900x the cost)

Recommend moving forward. Happy to discuss details.

[Your Name]
```

---

## Objection Handlers

### "That ROI seems too good to be true"
**Response:**
"The ROI is high because Sybil attacks are EXPENSIVE and Vaultfire is CHEAP. We're not charging for the value we provide, we're charging for the infrastructure cost. Think of it like: preventing a $1M governance attack costs you $6k. The math checks out."

### "We don't have Sybil problems"
**Response:**
"With respect, you definitely do. Every protocol does. Run this analysis: Look at your last airdrop. Cluster the wallet addresses by behavior patterns. I guarantee 40-60% are Sybils. You just don't see it because they're sophisticated."

### "Can't we build this in-house?"
**Response:**
"Sure. Budget 12+ months and $1M+ in development costs for ZK proof systems, security audits, infrastructure. OR integrate Vaultfire in 5 minutes for $0.10 per verification. Your call, but opportunity cost of 12 months in this market is probably $10M+."

### "We'll wait and see"
**Response:**
"Fair, but your competitors won't wait. First protocol with Sybil-resistant airdrops gets the 'most secure' narrative. That's worth millions in marketing value alone. Can you afford to let [competitor] get this first?"

---

## Final Calculation: Partnership vs. Not

**Partnership with Vaultfire:**
- Cost: $1k - $500k (depending on scale)
- Benefit: $1M - $100M+ (Sybil prevention + revenue increase)
- Time to integrate: 5 minutes - 1 week
- Risk: Minimal (we handle infrastructure)

**No Partnership:**
- Cost: $0 upfront
- Hidden cost: $10M - $100M/year (Sybil fraud + opportunity cost)
- Competitive disadvantage: High
- Risk: Governance attacks, reputation damage, user loss

**The math is obvious.** 🔥

---

**Use this calculator in your pitch deck. Show them the money they're losing every day they wait.**
